natural

CIE Holiday Shopping Guide

zzpets

News recently broke (and unbroke) about the unsafe levels of the toxic compound antimony on this Holiday season’s hottest new toy, Zhu Zhu Pets.  Until then, it seemed like a great gift for the times: inexpensive, simple, and oh so cute.  But the alarm raised by the exposure of a certain fireproofing chemical used in its manufacture should not be dismissed.  Standards for toy manufacture, and, for that matter, product manufacture, remain at once lax and rather unregulated.  Fortunate thing we have groups like GoodGuide that are helping the consumer to navigate the waters of safe/unsafe in a wide range of products, from toys to food to personal care items.

Similarly, we have publications such as The Blue Pages: A Directory of Companies Rated by Their Politics and Practices to help educate the consumer on the business practices of large companies and manufacturers.  The more we know about how our products are made (and by whom), the easier it is to support business practices that we, as consumers, approve of.

In that vein, my Holiday Shopping Guide is a compendium of companies recommended by both GoodGuide and The Blue Pages.  Get out your shopping lists and get ready to edit!

Greenest Toy Companies of 2009 — Good Guide

The Blue Pages: 10 Best Brands to Buy this Holiday Season (via Air America):

  • Gap
  • Tiffany and Co.
  • Best Buy
  • Hewlett-Packard
  • Kenneth Cole
  • Campbell Soup Company
  • Naked Juice
  • The North Face
  • Ben and Jerry’s

The Blue Pages: The Top Ten Companies to AVOID this Holiday Season (via Air America):

  • The Children’s Place
  • Hanes
  • JC Penney
  • The Limited Brands
  • IBM
  • Albertson’s
  • Chiquita
  • L’Oreal
  • Target — ouch! That one’s gonna hurt!
  • Wal-Mart

Tags: , , , ,

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009 Buy This!, Don't Buy This! 5 Comments

Diapers: Cloth or Disposable?

When I was expecting the Little One, I dreaded this question.  For me, it was like the “paper or plastic” question that you feel like you never really have all of the information necessary to make an informed decision (and if you’ve ever felt the same about the ‘paper or plastic?’ question, RUN, don’t walk, to this helpful breakdown).  But with ‘Cloth or Disposable?’, I felt even more lost; for one thing, I wasn’t even a mom yet, so hadn’t even honed my diaper changing skills.  I didn’t know how much and to what extent diapers would consume my future life, so had no real clue of what information was necessary to make this choice.

As a sustainability-friendly person, my instinct was that ‘cloth’ was the right answer.  Much in the same way that many sustainability-friendly folks believe that ‘paper’ is the corresponding right answer among bagging issues.  But I soon found, upon the Little One’s birth, that the choice here becomes a far more personal one than which type bag to use.  Here is how I found the path to my favorite pick:

My initial response to the dreaded question was that I intended to try cloth, but begin with disposables; I figured the learning curve of caring for a newborn would be great enough without the added stress of trying to manage a new cloth diapering system.  Turns out that Whew!  I had that right!  So, after a little homework on the various options in disposables, I added Seventh Generation diapers to my baby registry.  They were hard to find; only one shop offered them locally at the time.  The best bet was to buy them online.  I’d been happy with both the products and philosophy of the Seventh Generation line, so I was looking forward to giving the diapers a shot.  Although they are, like most disposables, essentially a plastic-based product, no chlorine is used in their manufacture, which is helpful in a few ways:  Less processing required in manufacture means less carbon footprint; lack of chlorine makes diapers friendly to sensitive baby skin; no chlorine to leach into the groundwater after the diapers are disposed of.

The Little One finally showed up in October, and I was ready with my pick for disposable diapers.  My life became a diaper-changing marathon.  Any supply of diapers that I had armed myself with disappeared almost immediately.  No matter how many new packs I bought, it seemed I was always almost out of them.  Having chosen a brand that was difficult to find was not an optimal plan for the time.  I ended up supplementing with plenty of Pampers Swaddlers and Luvs, just because they were the ones I could buy at the nearest grocery store.  I’m glad that that happened, though, because it learned me something important:  The Little One’s bum consistently got rashy when I used any other brand than Seventh Gen.

After a couple of months when I finally felt like I was getting the hang of whole diapering thing, I began to branch out.  As a stop between disposable and cloth, I tried G Diapers.  This was essentially a 3-part system:  Cloth outer diaper, biodegradable/flushable/disposable insert, and protective plastic liner.  They were freakin adorable.  I loved how they looked on him, and the fit and absorbency was generally right on.  I liked that the insert was flushable, but as we have septic system out here, that option was just not for us.  The use of the G diaper required a little more planning than the full disposables; there were two outer cloth diapers, which needed to have the plastic liner snapped in place, in order to place the disposable insert, in order for the diaper to go on baby.  Fine to plan out for an afternoon diaper change; at 2 am, however, not so much.

And just to wade a little into full cloth, I picked up a Bum Genius set.  Super cute, super soft.  If I were a baby, this is what I would want wrapping my tush.  Aesthetically, it’s like the infant equivalent to Charmin Ultra.

Here, however, was the dealbreaker for me and cloth, and even me and G diapers:  the Little One is famous for his consistently huge, runny poops.  Even at 2, that kid can fill a diaper.  Full.  “Man poops” is how is daycare teacher jokingly characterized them.  He made an awful mess of the poor Bum Genius.  The kind that never quite washed out, and left it discolored.  The G diapers would get all three layers saturated, necessitating a frantic run to the washing machine on a regular basis.  But the Seventh Gen held it.  Sure there were blow-outs, but few and far between as compared to the alternatives.

And now, many more places carry Seventh Generation locally, making them a consistently attractive option.  In fact, I can’t remember the last time I used anything else.  The Little One is slowly turning his sights to the potty, but I’ve got Kid 2.0 on the way as well; if his/her claim to fame does not include “man poops”, I might be inclined to give cloth another try.  Any input or advice is welcome!

Tags: , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009 Buy This!, Kids, pregnancy No Comments

Hair care during pregnancy

I blame the pregnancy message boards.  At the outset of my first pregnancy, I was blissfully oblivious to the potential hazards of shampoo.   Then, the posting was clicked: “Shampoo?“, then, the link followed: “Pregnancy Alert: Shampoo Ingredient Could Damage Developing Brain Cells“.  It should have carried a warning: “Danger!  Can of worms about to be opened“!  Because what unfolded was a long lesson in the vile substances in personal care products that could, key word: could, have the potential of harm to a developing baby.

If you think about it, our skin is our largest organ, so concern about hazards during pregnancy should not stop with what we simply ingest.  We do, like it or not, absorb many additional things through our skin, intentionally or no.  Here’s the main thing to take away from the link above: shampoo often contains an ingredient called methylisothiazolinone, a substance that acts as an antimicrobial agent, to give the shampoo a long shelf life.  Here’s the thing, though: methylisothiazolinone is a neurotoxic chemical.  It really shouldn’t be used in shampoo at all.  But it shows up in far more than just shampoo.  The Household Products Database has it listed as an ingredient in a wide variety of products: house paint, shampoo, conditioner, hand soap, hair color…….See the list here.

In addition to the Household Products Database, coming to the rescue to help us sort through the maze of ingredients on our personal care products is the Cosmetics Database, who warn: “Major gaps in public health laws allow cosmetics companies to use almost any ingredient they choose in everything from sunscreen and mascara to deodorant and baby shampoo, with no restrictions and no requirement for safety testing. To help you navigate your store’s aisles, Environmental Working Group researchers have scoured thousands of ingredient labels to bring you our top recommendations for what not to buy — products with worrisome or downright dangerous ingredients that don’t belong in your shopping cart or on your skin”.

They do a commendable job of rating personal care products based on the safety of their ingredients.  And it’s clearly not just methylisothiazolinone that is of concern here.  The database also singles out Placenta, Lead, Fragrance, Animal Parts, Hydroquinone Skin Lightener, Nanoparticles, Phthalates, and Petroleum By-products as the ingredients causing the highest concern.  Yes, these products really are in the personal care products we use every day without question.

But no despair necessary:  being pregnant does not condemn one to a 9 month avoidance of personal care products.  My picks for a low-chemical personal care routine, having already done the work of hashing through the Cosmetic Database’s findings and trying a wide range of the green-lighted products:

Shampoo:  Burt’s Bees – widely available; does a good job with far fewer ingredients of concern.

Conditioner:  Aubrey Organics – for my fine, dry, wavy hair, the Island Naturals conditioner can’t be beat.

Cosmetics:  100% Pure – amazing products.  The tinted moisturizer, eye shadows, and blush all get big thumbs up.

Skin creams and shower gel:  California Baby – I hate to say it……….as good as Kiehl’s.  It’s true.  The Calendula cream kicks Kiehl’s Abyssine cream’s butt, and it’s so much kinder to the wallet.  And with far fewer ingredients of concern.

Nail Polish:  Priti Polish – nail polish and remover is one of the leading offenders in chemical content.  Priti, astoundingly enough, offers a great product without the harsh ingredients that throw out the red flags.

As far as hair color goes:  Better to wait until after the first trimester, and thereafter, better to go to a stylist, who can apply the coloring so that it does not make contact with your scalp.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009 Don't Buy This!, Personal Care, pregnancy 1 Comment

Morning Sickness: A Rant

I try to make healthy, balanced and sustainable food choices.  That is always my goal in shopping and cooking and selecting restaurants.  And one would think, wouldn’t one, that during pregnancy, this goal would only be that much more important?  One would.  Think.

But here is a sampling of a typical pre-pregnancy menu in this household:  Pot Roast of locally raised beef and garden veggies, local greens salad with homemade bread.  Or lamb chops with a balsamic reduction and local blue potato wedges with garden squash pie.

Now, during the worst phase of the first trimester:  Pizza and cookies.  Fast food hamburger and fries.  Major-chain restaurant spaghetti and meatballs.  Velveeta Shells and Cheese.  Seriously, the best (healthy balanced and/or sustainable) that I can do for a satisfying meal is a loaded baked potato, fruit and a green salad, but preferably prepared by someone else.   And then I’ll need a cupcake in a couple of hours, and another before bed.

The culprit here: morning sickness.  The very mechanism that is designed to help me make safe food choices is the stick in my culinary spokes.  Before I was ever pregnant, I envisioned morning sickness as passing waves of nausea, punctuated by some vomiting.  The version that I’ve gotten, though, is the constant seasickness that has changed my entire relationship with food.  I know that it is temporary, but I am appalled at my food choices lately.

I realize that the biological point of morning sickness and the weird cravings/aversions is also to help my body gain excess fat to store, as well as to keep a safe distance from potentially hazardous things like raw meat.  But the things that I’m craving have their definite downsides:  The processed food with the preservatives and additives and high fructose corn syrup and hydrogenated oils and food coloring and…….ech……just making myself feel ill.  I’m sure you get my point:  When you rely on food that someone else has made for you, and that relationship is a distant one, you tend to ingest a lot of crap that is not beneficial to your own body, let alone a tiny vulnerable bean growing inside you.

When I first found out about my first pregnancy, I quickly ordered the book “Eating for Pregnancy” to make sure that my nutritional i’s would be dotted and t’s would be crossed.  I never made a single recipe from the book, though – as soon as morning sickness kicked in, I couldn’t even look at a recipe, let alone shop productively in a grocery store.  I lamented to my OB, who assured me that my former pre-pregnancy diet would be enough to sustain my body through the first trimester.  “If you ate well before you were pregnant”, she said, “you’ll be fine”.  I hope to heck she’s right.

Tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009 pregnancy 1 Comment

Pregnancy: a new category at CIE

If I could choose one event in my life that, more than any other, furthered my awareness of product ingredients and how they affect the human body, it would have been my pregnancy in 2007.  Most newly pregnant women are pummelled with the basic information on what to avoid during pregnancy, and in most cases, these things were no surprise:  raw/undercooked meat, smoking, illicit drugs, unpasteurized cheese, cat litter……….but aside from the pamphlet list that you get from the doctor, there are actually very many more products and drugs and airborne things to know about; something that I learned slowly over the course of the nine months before the Little One’s birth.

Just this morning, MSNBC ran a bit about the rise in autism rates; it was 1 in 150 during my last pregnancy.  Now, just 2 1/2 years later, it is 1 in 91.  Although no one can or wants to say definitively what is causing this rise, I think most of the scientific community agrees that, in addition to the genetic factor, it is a result of multiple toxic exposure during pregnancy.  Therefore, limiting such exposure when we are trying to conceive and when we are pregnant is the goal here.  But how to go about doing that?  That standard doctor’s list is a good place to start.  I will do my best to continue it here in this category over the coming months; and I am now invested in the subject as well — we are expecting our next little bundle in May.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, October 5th, 2009 pregnancy No Comments

Dishwashing, phosphate-free

Starting next year, Washington state is placing a ban on all dishwashing detergents that contain more than 1/2% phosphate. This legislation is being enacted due to the seepage of the phosphate into lakes and groundwater, which feeds algae and as a result, diminishes the supply of oxygen for fish. Other states, including Maryland, are considering similar legislation.

Those of you that have dishwashers have probably settled into a comfortable routine with the detergent of your choice, but if that comfortable routine involves a detergent that contains phosphates, I’m afraid a change is due. The market is already littered with a handful of phosphate-free detergents, and as I’ve tried many of them over the course of the last year or two (with a little nudge from my very eco-wise mom), I offer my experiences and my favorite pick from among them.

For comparison’s sake, it’s probably helpful to mention that all of the following detergents were tried with a Fisher-Paykel Dish Drawer:

  • Ecover dishwashing tablets. Here is where I began, and was happily surprised by the cleaning power and efficiency of these little tabs. Dishes were consistently sparkling, without residue, and depending on the length of the dishwashing cycle, I could often get TWO uses from one tablet. Awesome!
  • Seventh Generation dishwashing powder. Picked up one day when the local shop where I buy Ecover was out of stock. Since I already use many products in the Seventh Generation line, I was happy to give it a shot. As it turns out, though, this was the worst of the bunch. Glasses almost always ended up gritty with residue, and left a thin layer of residue on the Little One’s sippy cups. Ick. I was better off washing these things by hand, which was kind of contrary to the point.
  • Seventh Generation dishwashing tablets. As soon as these also came on the market, I was willing to try. I didn’t want to give up on using 7thGen dishwashing products. Again, I experienced similar negative results as with the powder. Ick.
  • BioKleen dishwashing powder. Better than 7thGen, but also left a thin residue on the Little One’s sippys. Deal breaker.
  • And most recently, Method’s new dishwashing tablets. They do a good job of getting the dishes clean, once in a while leaving the thin residue on the Little One’s sippys, but I just have to remember to check them all before using. I would generally recommend them, but the thing is, the tablets themselves are HUGE! Just to fit the tablet in my dishwasher’s compartment, I have to break it in half. Seriously, Method, did you do research here?

And the winner, by a country mile, is Ecover Automatic Dishwashing Tablets. Bravo, Ecover — you were early to the market with your product, and hard to beat when it comes to your competitors. You have a loyal customer in me!

Tags: , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009 Buy This! 3 Comments